When we say “True Justice or Justice (the Justice ideal or the ideal of justice here is the concept of today and past ruling classes. As “true justice” is the way I perceive and conceive the ideal of “justice.”) we really put a very big word in our minds.

The problem here, however, that makes the “Justice ideal” confusing, to some extent a puzzle, and to some other extent a ridiculous idea, is in the fact that justice is associated with the idea of Laws.

 "Laws, on the other hand, and the way laws historically have been made, have not served and still do not serve to the ideal of true justice."

If you think differently, then, I ask you, "tell me a time in the human history where laws were not made to serve to the powerful rich people? And tell me too, in our time; aren’t our laws serving to the powerful rich people?"

So, why do I think that Justice is not made by LAWS, that support today rich cronies or that have supported the past rich cronies? one may ask.

Let me begin expressing my philosophy here by saying that we all have seen today injustice.
Like the extreme....

Read More

Media and journalism must be a divine mission that serve to humanity, democracy and great human values. Like freedom, truth, fairness, equality, justice and so on. But the rich of today, like they have done in all human history, have turned media into a business thing. Corrupted journalists see media as “a will to money power thing.” And media bosses do the same. Here then we need a solution for the sake of truth, fairness, democracy and our humanity.

Let’s take as an example, the most corrupted media in the world - The U.K Media. And here prepare to read my philosophy of change as well. So in the U.K Corrupted media on the one hand, we have the very rich, Rubert Murdoch of The Sun and all right wing media, supporting the U.K Government with their ideas. And on the other hand, we have the less rich, the Guardian and all left wing media, supporting the Labour Party and Jeremy Corbyn.

Is this our free and independent MEDIA then?

Even the blind can see here and the deaf can hear the “Two centuries and half problem.” From the gestation of the idea “left and right wing media” in the French Revolution, and up to 2018, we never had an independent and fair media that is dedicated to truth and is impartial in its way of thinking. And that’s true as my being on earth.

Media has been and still is the mouthpiece of politics and politicians. And in the U.K left and right wing media fight like wolves for the left and right wing political ideologies. That is their political interest. That’s why we have a royal baby from birth to death trending here. As people who have ideas can’t use this corrupted media to express ideas for change.

On the top of what I said, the same journalists and the same media bosses dare to use even police and security power to protect their political interests and silence the voices of the thinking humanity. And one of these examples is myself. A man with ideas and who has been almost choked to death by the security of the most corrupted media in the world – the U.K Media.

So what is the solution for us here to have a MEDIA that serves to humanity and that is dedicated to truth and to the impartiality of thinking and doing?

Here comes my idea that I call “CHARITY MEDIA.” An idea that can be possible in our “internet days.” And an idea that serves to truth, reason and humanity. Well but what do I mean with this idea “CHARITY MEDIA,” then?

First of all, let us separate media from politics. Political parties can remain left and right, green and blue. However, if media wants to be called “independent and fair” then media must be separated from politics. And so be impartial.

But can a rich media be impartial? Can a journalist like “Piers Morgan or Andrew Neil” etc., that are super paid, be impartial? Even a donkey, if he had a human consciousness, would be able to understand that Money Power would corrupt the best of us. For there where big money comes in and goes out there big corruption exists. And it is there, it is these institutions that we must fight for the sake of human justice.

Therefore, because of the fact that on the fairness, freedom and independence of the media depends the freedom of the living humanity, then we need to invent a different way and a fair one through which media journalists can be paid.

So, I suggest media to be funded neither in the way of NHS and teachers nor paid by the very rich corporations like it is today. In this way of thinking, we separated media from politics and corporations too. Welcome to the free and fair world! How can the journalists be paid then?

The solution then is one. Media to be funded by charity organisations that take the donations from the very people.

And every conscious human being who wants to live in freedom and fairness must donate. The first one to donate to as such charity organisation will be myself, Dr A.C.

What about the salaries of the journalists? Should we pay them with luxurious salaries so they can be as happy as pigs and as corrupted as criminals?

The salaries of the journalists must not be bigger than the salaries of the working class people. So we don’t have young journalists that dream “will to money power.” But rather we have young people that dream will to freedom, fairness and justice.

So in this way we have men and women who take up journalism with a mission for truth and justice that serve to humanity, and not with a mission for money power that serve to...

Read More

Why should Powerful Media Journalists need to take Responsibility for their Power? one may ask.

Jean Paul Sartre, a French philosopher considered as one of the greatest thinkers of the 20s century, said that “Freedom means Responsibility.”

So far so good.

So all I am asking from today journalists of the Mainstream Media, who get paid super luxurious salaries for speaking only, is RESPONSIBILITY for the SOCIAL POWER. That we, the people, have given to them.

And I'm asking for responsibility for their wrong thinking and doing or their actions. Is that hard?

The social power that we, the people, have given to the Journalists of Media is the power of information that they are controlling. And the laws that they are influencing without we, the opposing reason of today like myself, being able to participate in their media headquarters.

Now before explaining the evil thinking and doing of Andrew Neil and the reason, that tells why he must be in prison. Let us first take a general look at the U.K Media way of thinking.

And then come to the particular person, Andrew Neil. Also, the inspiration of the CORRUPT, disgusting and sickening UK MEDIA Thinking.

U.K Media General Way of Thinking

Many German intellectuals thought after the First World War that Jews were to be blamed for the German Defeat in the last war. And that the Jews were the problem or a problem. And one of these German intellectuals, who thought so, was and A. Hitler himself.

While, in our time, the majority of the U.K Media journalists have thought, in the last two decades at least, in relation to the religion of Islam. That Islam is the problem or a big problem.

Thus, like a pack of WOLVES, from the left and the right and the centre, the UK media journalists have thought that the religion of Islam is
...

Read More

Dear Journalists and Dj-Journalists or political assassins of the BBC.

Oppression means the oppression of ideas or to oppress people's ideas. Like, for example, by controlling INFORMATION through MEDIA MONOPOLIES.

And so it comes to pass that those who oppress ideas control the soul of humanity, the mind of this humanity, the soul to this economy and everything else.

That’s why you oppressed my ideas, and the ideas of the men of my time, for over a decade. Ideas that intended to support the freedom of ideas through platforms that contain the inception of this concept.

So the FACTS are evident here. You people, who work for the news MONOPOLIES of the BBC, like a herd of wild animals, support the oppression of ideas. That is the TRUTH.

Now, I know that many of you are intelligent writers and speakers or intelligent artists.

But, let me be honest with you, a writer and an artist was even Adolf Hitler, right?

So, because of fact that you may be skilful journalists or Dj-journalists etc., that doesn’t mean that you can’t be corrupted in your soul. Like you are. Is that right?

Because, as a matter of fact, you continually oppress creative minds that oppose your ideas. And here is my life example as truth and reason of this phenomenon.

So for years, you corrupted little “Hitlers” saw that you could easily drown “my truth and my reason, and my voice as an Oppressed immigrant in this country” out through the BBC’s reputation. And you continued to do so like a pack of wolves. Like a Nazi army. Very good!

You, the oppressors. I, the oppressed. You, the masters. I, the slave.

You promoting the OPPRESSION and the control of Ideas. I promoting the freedom of ideas and truth. You promoting, corruption. I promoting, fairness.

I, dreaming to see the freedom of ideas and working for this idea. You, oppressing ideas. And laughing up at your sleeves like instictual monkeys or mean barbarians.

And at the end, you being heard. I, being silenced forever.

In my case, however, is reflected the pain of the men of my age. For what you have done to me, you also have done to other independent thinkers, who opposed your ideas, as well. That’s logical.

So how good is the oppression of ideas for you, assassins, then?

You killed my voice politically. And you killed the voices of the men of my age, who wanted to participate in modern history through ideas, politically on purpose.

And you did it because we opposed your ideas. As you wanted to control information through news media MONOPOLIES. So we came to oppose each other. The oppressed and the oppressors.

And let's be honest, you still do it, you still kill our Voices. But in killing our Voices, however, you kill us. That means, you kill and continue to kill us politically. And as much as you can.

But why? When did you act so macabrely towards our voices or the voices of my generation?

Of course, as a matter of fact, you didn’t want us to be heard. You didn’t want our new ideas to be heard. And you wanted the old to continue to lead and oppress. That's why you thought and acted so.

In short, grovelling journalists and a mighty director-general was making the rules of Information for our entire U.K Nation. And assassinating our voices on purpose by not allowing us to participate and be heard with Ideas at BBC. That is our national TV.

Therefore, you are political assassins. For you did silence us and still do it to protect your power over people.

You murder our ideas with subtle and cunning Machiavelli-like ideas. Like big media’s reputation and police and security power.

Therefore, your continual oppression of the new ideas, your evil oppressive stance against opposing passions of the time, and your hatred towards the freedom of ideas can be compared only to a priest’s letter written by Voltaire in 18^th century. A letter that spoke of subtle killings and mass exterminations of humanity.

So like this priest, who with a cunning reason, wanted to kill innocent people that opposed the church. So you, the church of today, the BBC and Big Media in general, are silencing and murdering our reason. And our existential truth and our Voices.

At the end, your philosophy, dear assassins of the BBC News or Machiavelli-like journalists, is not even a subtle one.

For your philosophy rather is a barbaric ingenuity. Because you not only refuse to invite us, independent thinkers, in your studios and oppress our ideas through BBC’s reputation. But you also use security and police to silence us by force.

For on May, 2017, the BBC reported me to the Police because I opposed their ideas on twitter. Plus, let us speak here of the countless times that you have used your security power to silence my voice through sheer force.

Plus the truth of the matter that the security of the ITV almost choked me to death for holding up a few creative ideas. And you didn’t even condemn it!

And contrariwise, all of you praised the security of the ITV for the quick response. And their brutal way of dealing with peaceful protestors, and almost choked me to death! Good, isn’t it?

So, we see the facts and the figures that tell us that you are in control of our Ideal of information.

But how comes that you, genius barbarians of the BBC, control information, however you do not have a single show dedicated to the independent ideas?

And how comes that you for years use your reputation to drown out the opposing passions and forces of the time?

Further, the reputation of the BBC and its centuries-old authority impose its culture or way of thinking and doing into Europe willy-nilly. While, on the other hand, we immigrants, who come from Eastern Europe or other parts of the world, are not allowed to participate in here!

Unless, of course, we grovel like worms and think like you think.

Cultural Imperialism

So it comes to pass that in ur U.K, on the one hand, there is Dj-Journalist Charlie Sloth, DJ-journalist Target and a few others controlling entertainment industry on the behalf of the BBC. Inspiring Europe with gun and knife crime and imposing on the latter these very ideas.

On the other hand, there are journalists like Andrew Neil, Nick Robinson, Jeremy Paxaman and a few others from the big media who oppress ideas of all independent thinkers. And invite in their studios only people who think like they think.

So in the headquarters of our national TV called, the BBC, all THINK the same, the sheep and the wolves. While the thinking humanity that thinks and creates continues to be oppressed by the wolves.

So a saying of Theresa May makes perfectly sense in here. For once she said in New York while meeting her beloved Trump that, “We have won the war of ideas” 

And that is true. You have won the war of ideas. For you win the war of ideas with a gun of over the heads of those who oppose your ideas.

You see who you are then? Murdering Nazis and Assassins. That’s who you are.

So all is good and all is fine in our UK. The richer gets richer and the oppressors every single day get bigger by turning people into sheep. 

So, some happy boys control entertainment industry on the behalf of the BBC inspiring death and corruption. By bringing in their studios only people that they know. And all the time praising gun and knife crime. 

While our U.K government wages wars for corporate greed. The big media journalists continue to praise big corporations for their sponsorship! And this is the happiness of our state, social power and corruption. Politicians on the one side, and artists on the other controlling us.

So you, journalists of the BBC and of the BIG MEDIA, who are intelligent and  know many things, you oppress and drown out our ideas as much as possible on purpose.

And the purpose is to control INFORMATION. And thus continue to roll and push the wheel of history by controlling and oppressing us forever. 

And by controlling and oppressing us, you accumulate big amounts of social power. And thus you impose your ideas not only on us but on all the people around the world.

And the imposition of ideas on others through a dominating and powerful culture is what is called, cultural imperialism, my dear BBC.

For once you enslave the British people, then you use them to control the world. And it is this form of intelligent oppression that gives me the right as a “Freedom-Fighter and citizen of the world” to oppose your oppressive philosophies.

Anyways I am not trying to dissociate myself from the British people here. simply I am expressing my pain. 

For as a matter of fact, I lived in London during the most important years of my life. I served and studied. So I am a citizen of this city too.

However, like the majority of the British people, I lived as a slave in this country. And as a slave with a pen and ideas. As you were the masters with guns and security oppressing my voice and my ideas forever.

At the end, we do not make sense. For we are senseless human beings. Still, allow me to lecture you here on how to make sense for a better world. 

Dear oppressors of the BBC, we can make sense through creativity. And when creativity is based on the great ideas of humanity, that we found engraved in the skies by the great minds.

And thus when creativity intends to make the world a better place. Then, that means that this form of creativity is Positive Creativity. And it must not be oppressed.

But, you, journalists of the BBC, have done your best and still do your best to oppress positive, creative ideas as much as possible.

Then, to oppress ideas, like you do, that means to not want to make sense or to not want to let others to make sense.

For Einstein said that we make sense in working for a better world. However, you cronies of the BBC are making sense in working for a worse world. You are making sense in oppressing others. And, somehow, it is your oppressive philosophy that pushes rappers to glamorize gun and knife crime. For we know that they glamorize violence to catch attention.

So it seems that you have found the way! And you are okay with it! No change is needed anymore! Rappers glamorize gun crime to catch attention. And you oppress new ideas and stifle change. And hence we see London a city where stabbing has become as common as an English breakfast!

Therefore, to be like you, it means to exist with the soul and the spirit of dictators and dictatorships. And that’s who you are.

For years, I worked to see a world of dialogue, ideas, truth, reason and humanity. At the beginning I asked for an opportunity to....

Read More

Brendan Cox: “2016 can be a wake-up call”

 Well let me begin to analyze the main parts of his speech.

 "Jo loved Christmas, the games, the traditions, the coming together of friends and family and above all the excitement of our kids." He said.

 Mr. Cox tells me here what a good human character stands for. And this character was his wife - a brilliant visionary woman called, Jo Cox. A woman that lost her life while fighting with her soul and heart and head to better our humanity.

 The beginning of the speech also shows me what unites us. That is Family. On the one hand, our little family with brothers and sisters and kids and wives. And on the other hand, our traditions and our bigger family that is society.

“Society!” Did I just say? A society that has lost sense of its humanity. A society that is totally alienated and money-oriented. Like it is money that created us! And not we and our virtue that created money.

 A society that is about to lose its essence. For human essence is in seeing the world as a family and the family as part of the world. But our society is turning a blind eye to the things that matter.

And to be honest, it seems that our society is forgetting the bloodshed of the past in order to repeat it in the present!

Now, the reason of why I loved Mr. Cox’s speech is this human unity that he shows in it. His little family that is connected to the society. That is our bigger family. And our bigger family that affected the happiness of his family.

One among “US” or among our society took his wife away so soon and so brutally. So destroying the happiness of the little family of Brendan Cox forever. Murdering a living soul that was working to make our bigger family a better family. A war-hearted woman that wouldn't hurt a fly.

 Here I wanted to make the point that we are connected to one another so intricately. That the saying of Buddha that goes “all is one,” makes perfect sense to me.

For we share being on earth and we share nothingness as well.

For how can one deny the fate of humanity? Unless one is not aware of being a human among other humans.

 So Brendan Cox went on and said: “2016 has been an awful year for our family, and it’s been a divisive one for the wider world. A year in which fascism, xenophobia, extremism and terrorism made us divided and felt threatened, from America, to Europe, to the Middle East and beyond.”

 What I like of Mr. Cox in here again is that in showing his pain, he also manifest the pain of an entire humanity. For hatred, that killed his wife, the magnificent Jo Cox, is in the same time killing and dividing an entire humanity. That is our bigger family.

 Einstein once said, “love is the answer.” And no doubt that love and unity are ideals where we must stick forever.

But, however, the question here is how to defeat a neo-fascism that wants the world under its clutches?

A neo-fascism that cries for blood and violence. As we cry for love, unity and understanding.

 Although, here is something that Brendan Cox leaves unsaid either unwittingly or on purpose.

 For I have a question here, "Who gave birth to these neo-fascist movements? To these violent groups that are cropping up every now and then all across Europe and America?

And the answer is that "the ones who gave birth to them are the ones who pretend to be the bearers of today standards – the Big Media.

For whenever that an immigrant happens to do something bad in Europe or USA, they make a mountain out of a mole hill. They create an entire movie out of something that needs merely a description and leaving the authorities and laws do their job.

So big media monopolies begin exaggerating and exaggerating and exaggerating things until they make people feel threatened through exaggerated and manipulated facts.  

This way of thinking increases the blood-level in the people's veins above tolerance And thus at the end, they achieve finally to inspire hatred.

And it is at this moment that ordinary  people begin to act on a mission. That is, they become xenophobic and hateful towards immigrants and foreigners. for they demand to save their nations from those that media monopolies describes as terrorists and criminals. 

Hurray for hatred then! For at the end we have the HATE SPEECH of MEDIA MONOPOLIES become HATE CRIME. Thank you much. 

Therefore, the today chauvinists are the pupils of the today bearers of standards. And the latter are but the greedy bears of the big media.

And all they want is but money while sucking the blood of the poor and of the wretched immigrants. That are attacked by all sides. And can't find a place to call home thanks to the hatred of the billionaire European media monopolies. 

So it comes to pass that Big Media wants to sell stories. And to hate the immigrants is what sells, gentlemen.

So the media monopolies are the ones who hate and the ones who again pretend to be saving society from hatred! Isn’t this just too ridiculous, then?

Therefore, dear reader, I understand why Brand Cox, if he is the writer of his speech, leaves Big Media out of the picture that matters to be mentioned here.

And he does that because Big Media is the one giving him fame. Big media is making his voice being heard. The same big media that, on the other side, is using police and security power to silence my voice, the voice of an immigrant and thinker, by force.

 Mr. Cox went on saying, “And these trends could strengthen - they could gain momentum they could consolidate and they could threaten the fundamental freedoms, and democracy that our grandparents fought for.”

We know that that is true. Evil can strengthen and trump good. Form we remember the beautiful past. The evil force and power of the Nazis and Fascists. And before them, we remember the English killing the French and vice versa, don't we?

And we remember, the French hating the Germans and vice versa. And the English setting the Germans against the French and the French against the Germans and so on. We remember all the great past, don't we?

This is then, our brilliant European history that is but a nausea. And that we don’t want to be repeated.

 And so Brendan Cox said, “But that isn’t how it has to be.” And I agree.

 “Just as it has become apparent that tolerance and tolerant societies are only as strong as their defenders - there is nothing inevitable about the rise of hatred.

Instead of being a turning point for the worse, 2016 could be a wake-up call that brings us back together.

A wake-up call for all those of us who thought that the  values that feel so much part of our society; of tolerance, of fair play - were in some way sacrosanct and didn’t need defending.”

Here again, I want to point out his brilliant idea of tolerance and defending values and trying to unite us through our values. 

 For we are and have to be tolerant in what we think that is not destructive to our common good. And we come together or unite as humans because of our common good and common human fate. 

And therefore, for our common good and common values, we must defend our dwelling place from evil, and wild animals. Who spread hate and racism. 

 But what is evil, anyways?

An American philosopher said that evil is just the...

Read More

Well, I made all the questions of my ideas on the headline of this composition.

So now all what is left here is to take these questions one by one. And express our thinking by putting these questions on the table of philosophy. And thus explain as such ideas, like people of wisdom do. That is through thinking and creating.

Hence, I ask, Why altruism? 

Here, first of all let us indicate what do we mean by the word 'altruism?'

The concept of Altruism comes from the Italian concept of altrui, that means someone else. And that is derived from the Latin concept, ‘alter.’ That means, other.

So, altruism is an image or idea that brings in my mind the image of Jean Paul Sartre, and his philosophy of “The Other.” That in certain points of the meaning of his thinking says, 'I'm the other and the other is me.” A philosophy that is somehow like that famous expression of Buddha that says, “One in all and all in one.”

Now, at this point of thinking, we see that the East and the West become one through altruism. For, the Western philosophy of the other of Sartre and the oneness of Buddha of the East here, in the altruist thinking or philosophy, become ‘one oneness’ within another oneness in the oneness of the oneness of nothingness within the nothingness of somethingness.

So I ask, “Is the other I and am I the other?

Here, by making this question, we intend to penetrate deep in the human consciousness. Deep in the mysteries of the human mind. And deep in the unknown and philosophy. For at this point of thinking, we enter into the inconceivable that is only slightly perceptible. And we enter or dive in the slightly perceptible thinking that looks like ‘the imperceptible.’

And I say that or think so by withdrawing my reason from this question that ask continually my thinking mind: Can I be like the other? And can the other be like me? Can we be one in all and all in one in any way of thinking?

My answer is this.

I think that we are...

Read More

Do you remember that value that our forefathers and our ancestors praised historically so high? That values that they raised up to the skies and glorified heroically and with great heroism. That value that they compared with the gods of the beyond worlds and the light of the bright stars. You remember it, don't you, dear folks of the today?

From Zarathustra of the East to the Socrates of the West, from Aristotle to Nietzsche and from the latter till now all these great humans of the past times have spoken with such a great pleasure, great love and great virtuosity about the

Read More

Slavery Is Abolished in the UK. Is it?

History tells us that slavery predates written records. And it has existed in many cultures, many places, many countries and amid many tribes and many races. Beautiful. How beautiful that it is. Isn’t it, dear folks?

However, one who works in Britain for £6.50 per hour, like I do, may say "that I’m not a slave. He may say it with a lazy London accent ‘nah!’ As another one may say it in a strict foreign accent ‘no!’ Or in a mediocre slow-motion, swollen, puffy accent ‘no wayyyy man! That’s not true, no, not at all man, I’m not a slave!’ One among many different people of London may say!
 
And I wonder, can we change their minds if we tell them a few things about the evil genius philosophy of the wise and of the clever that use antique but unique mirrors to reflect the past and create the present?

If we tell them that human history is all about master and slaves, all about the oppressed and the oppressors, the exploited and the exploiters and nothing has changed?

Can we change their minds if we tell them how today masters coax the simple people out with £6.50 per hour, when £6.50 costs a bottle of water in some shops, bars and pubs in London town and around? Then…
 
Let me tell you that the incomes of the working class people is only enough to survive in London. For high bills, high living standers, broken dreams, broken hearts and modern slavery is all what we see. 
 
 
 So sometimes I think that it is a beautiful thing to be a thinking subject. To think and reflect being. And especially, it is beautiful to desire to reflect in the within and in the without your being.

 For we need to think and reflect and wake people up. For slavery is a historical problem.

And history tells us, that slavery was prevalent in more or less every ancient civilization, and society, including Sumer, Ancient Egypt, Ancient Greeks, Assyria, the Hebrew kingdoms in Palestine, Ancient China, the Akkadian Empire, Assyria, Ancient India, the Roman Empire, the Islamic Caliphate, and the pre-Columbian civilizations of the Americas.

Well, now we know that slavery has been...

Read More

And life confided the secret to me: behold, it said, I am that which must always overcome itself. 

Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra

Many people live through subconsciously rather than consciously. For what they have learnt in life has fed their subconscious thinking with things that they did not consider important. 

However, when these people come to the fore of social interaction, all what they show is what they have learnt and that they did not consider important. But that however, as such form of knowledge invaded their subconscious thinking. And slept there for ages.

But also, even those who live consciously and are always in the action of learning what is new and different make mistakes. 

And absorb wrong and prejudiced theories. And this is evident with authors who take certain books and authors as absolute truths. And soon fall into the trap of prejudice themselves. 

Hence, I think that in all walks of life and in life itself, there is always something to overcome. 

And it is overcoming ourselves that presupposes becoming ourselves. 

Nietzche said, for example, that  man is an animal that must be overcome. 

And this does not mean that man is an animal. More exactly Nietzche meant that in man is the animal value inside.

Like for example, the animal feelings, the brutality of man, the arrogance of man, the hawkish pride of man, and so on with other negative values of man.

Hence, to overcome a bad feeling, a....

Read More