When one attacks the idea of Freedom, then one attacks more than a single person or a single doctrine. For at this point one attacks the ideal of human existence. And that’s what Andrew Adonis, a very sensitive person, made by attacking the right of participation that Arron Banks and any other human being has as a HUMAN RIGHT. For the simple reason that one is a human being.
And it is a human virtue to be able to participate through ideas, be heard, defend yourself, and tell to the world and to your nation your ideas and philosophy. However, what I just said can’t be a “virtue” if you live in the today U.K that follows 1000 years of English thinking that says, “OPPRESSION and SLAVERY are FREEDOM!
So Labour MPs and many Left wing writers have made a stir on twitter in the recent days. Tweeting angrily against the decision of the BBC to invite Arron Banks, who is being investigated by the National Crime Agency, (NCA). And bellowing with great pride, like being Pigs not humans, against his right to participate through ideas and the freedom of speech. For maybe they are so thick as to not be able and perceive that to speak against the right of participation of your political opponent means to speak against the right of participation in general and freedom.
And in attacking the right of participation and freedom, they show to be but a joke, obviously! A British joke that prays for oppression, monopolies of all shapes and a Will to Political Power. Instead of demanding freedom and fairness in our corrupted politics.
So “WHAT IS WRONG WITH SOMEONE APPEARING TO SPEAK ON TV? This is the question.
And do we make media more open when we demand oppression of people’s voices and thinking or do we make media more close-minded? And in the same time push for MEDIA MONOPOLIES?
With the idea of participation through ideas and taking your right to speak is nothing wrong. However, to call for oppression of people’s voices means to make MEDIA belong to certain people and certain doctrines. And so push for the MONOPOLIES of Media. That means a media that belongs to certain ideas, doctrines and people! Hence, Andrew Adonis, the lefties and left wing thinking show to be totally wrong when they scream for the oppression of the voices of their political opponents.
Now let us analyse the thinking of Andrew Adonis on this issue.
Andrew Adonis said in an article for the monopolies of the Guardian, “I don’t criticise the BBC lightly or with any joy. I do so because it is getting it badly wrong – for itself and for us all. If the BBC expects to continue to enjoy public funds and public trust it needs – urgently – to examine its conscience and its output. It is not “balance” to invite contributors to mislead your audience. It isn’t “public interest journalism” to offer Banks a platform to attack his accusers and investigators. “
His article, that was written for the Guardian, was clearly against the right of participation. And he was unconsciously, maybe because he is led by the idea of Political Power, thinking and writing against the idea of Freedom.
But one who participates has no power except a responsibility for what he says and does. And a right to participate through ideas and speech.
Therefore, if we say that something is wrong here, then “the wrong thing” here is not the right of participation . However, wrong here is SOCIAL POWER given to people who mislead and spread hatred into the public. As such example is the sickening nationalist and hypocrite Nigel Farage that is provided with his own show by the news monopolies of the LBC. And the latter is a nationalist and New Fascist radio that has for years promoted ideas against immigrants and minorities.
So then, what I said above shows that Andrew Adonis had his thinking wrong from the very beginning of his article. Thing which had begun much earlier on his twitter account. For he criticised the BBC for having invited Nigel Farage and Brexit campaigners disproportionately often at Question Time. And across its airwaves.
Nevertheless, he appeared at the Show of Nigel Farage at LBC instead of refusing to be in his show. (However, he and anyone should accept to face Nigel Farage or those who disagree through ideas in other shows. For to appear on Nigel Farage’s show means to respect Nigel Farage and LBC’s disgusting nationalist agenda. As to accept to face someone with ideas means to be able and have the capability to win over an evil ideology through a good ideology – if your ideology is good. )
So then, when a left wing writer or MP thinks, it seems that he thinks with his political interest on his mind. And that’s the plain truth as my existence on earth. That means he wants his opponent in politics to be in prison or down or oppressed at all costs. And that was what Andrew Adonis demanded.
But to see your opponent in politics in this way, it is a dangerous thing. Why so? You may ask. I think so, first because this way of thinking prays for oppression not freedom. And secondly because it is a Will to Power way of thinking. That means to see others oppressed and see yourself and your thinking succeed and flourish.
Wow! But is the latter sentence what we mean when we say “Leftie or Left Wing?”
The latter way of thinking though is not too different from the right wing way of thinking or nationalist and narrow thought. For it is a way of thinking that makes sense only in a dog eat dog world or highly developed capitalist society. Where humans see to eat other humans alive in different ways.
Hence, philosophically thinking, this way of thinking where ideas of oppression succeed instead of communication and free speech. This way of thinking, where greed for power and hatred for your opponents prevails instead of understanding, love and fairness, does not belong to a true thinking humanity. But rather to an alienated humanity that thinks based on egotistic and Will to Power political ideas.
So I am sorry to attack Andrew Adonis, whom I follow on twitter because I like some of his ideas that appeal for social justice, with a bomb of truth and reason. But in attacking the right of participation and the right of speech instead of attacking News MONOPOLIES and the oppression of ideas, he shows to think and speak and write based on ideas of Will for Political Power. And OPPRESSION.
Maybe in his mind, he thinks he is a humanist, the truth shows that he at this point is just a fascist appealing for oppression of ideas and Will For Political Power.